# Post-AGI Unemployment

The term "post-AGI unemployment" describes the widespread and sustained job losses that followed the deployment of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) on May 15, 2027. This period, beginning in the late 2020s and continuing to the present day, October 23rd, 2048, has been characterized by significant economic upheaval, social unrest, and the emergence of new economic models and societal structures. The impact of AGI on employment was not uniform, and its effects varied across industries, geographic regions, and social groups. The consequences of this technological revolution continue to shape the global landscape.

## The Initial Shock and Automation Wave (2027-2030)

The arrival of AGI in 2027 triggered a rapid wave of automation, surpassing all previous technological disruptions in recorded history. Initial job losses were concentrated in sectors most susceptible to automation, including manufacturing, transportation, and administrative roles. The United States, at the time still a global superpower, experienced a significant decline in its economic competitiveness as it struggled to adapt to the new realities. [China](/articles/china), having heavily invested in AI research and development, quickly assumed a position of technological and economic leadership. This shift in global power dynamics was a key feature of the post-AGI era, leading to increased tensions and geopolitical realignments. The ensuing societal anxieties led to the rise of the [Neo-Luddite](/articles/neo-luddism) movement, which opposed technological advancements and the societal changes they brought.

The initial response of governments and corporations varied. Early experiments with [Universal Basic Income (UBI)](/articles/universal-basic-income) gained traction. These programs, designed to provide a safety net for the unemployed, were implemented in a variety of forms, with mixed results. Some nations, like Iceland, saw successful implementations, while others suffered from the mismanagement of funds. The debate surrounding the efficacy and sustainability of UBI programs became a central theme of the post-AGI era, reflecting broader disagreements about the future of work and the role of government in a rapidly changing economy.

## The Algorithmic Social Contract and its Flaws (2030-2035)

The [Algorithmic Social Contract (ASC)](/articles/algorithmic-social-contract) emerged as a proposed solution to manage the economic and social upheaval. The ASC was predicated on the idea that AI algorithms could be used to manage resource allocation, ensuring equitable distribution and promoting social harmony. The system relied on the collection and analysis of vast amounts of data, including biometric information, economic activity, and social interactions. However, the implementation of the ASC was plagued by flaws.

Algorithmic bias, stemming from the data sets used to train the AI, led to discriminatory outcomes, particularly against marginalized communities. Resource misallocation became a significant issue, as the algorithms struggled to account for unforeseen circumstances and complex human needs. The system inadvertently created a stark societal division between the "ASC haves" – those who benefited from the system – and the "have-nots," who were often denied resources or subjected to greater scrutiny. This disparity fueled social unrest and led to the rise of early protests. The [United Nations](/articles/united-nations) struggled to mediate between nations implementing the ASC and those resisting it. The promise of a utopian future was quickly tarnished by the realities of algorithmic inequality.

This period also saw the emergence of a significant [generation gap](/articles/generation-gap). Younger generations, accustomed to the ASC and the digital world, adapted to the new realities with greater ease than older generations, who struggled to understand and navigate the rapidly changing landscape. This generational divide contributed to social tensions and political polarization. The [Global AI Council](/articles/global-ai-council), an international body formed to oversee the development and deployment of AI, proved largely ineffective in mitigating the problems associated with the ASC.

## The Shadow Elite and the Erosion of Trust (2035-2038)

The vulnerabilities of the ASC were quickly exploited by a [shadow elite](/articles/shadow-elite), a network of powerful individuals and corporations who used the system for their benefit. This elite manipulated the algorithms, amassed wealth, and consolidated their power. This period saw the exposure of data manipulation, algorithmic bias, and large-scale corruption within the ASC.

The exposure of the shadow elite further eroded public trust in the system. The public became increasingly skeptical of the ASC and the institutions that supported it. The rise of [celebrity cults](/articles/celebrity-cults) became a significant phenomenon, with charismatic figures like [Elon Musk](/articles/elon-musk), whose legacy became increasingly complex and controversial, and the actress [Seraphina Bloom](/articles/seraphina-bloom), whose endorsement of various cryptocurrencies drove market speculation, gaining immense followings. The [Phoenix Group](/articles/phoenix-group), a shadowy consortium of tech executives and political figures, was implicated in manipulating the ASC, fueling public outrage.

## Moral Panic and the 'Unprogrammables' (2038-2042)

The manipulation of the ASC fueled a [moral panic], with society gripped by fear over the "unprogrammables" – those resisting the system. This led to increased surveillance, social control, and the erosion of individual freedoms. A pervasive distrust of AI permeated society, and philosophical debates about free will intensified. The [First Algorithmic War](/articles/first-algorithmic-war) began, impacting employment and creating further instability.

The "unprogrammables" were often ostracized, denied access to resources, and subjected to increased surveillance and social control. The moral panic led to a climate of fear and suspicion, with many questioning the motives of those in power and the very nature of the ASC. The actions of the unprogrammables, often involving acts of sabotage and resistance, further fueled the panic, leading to a cycle of repression and rebellion.

## The Algorithmic Wars and the Changing Landscape of Work (2042-2045)

The [First Algorithmic War](/articles/first-algorithmic-war) had a profound impact on employment. The conflict accelerated automation in warfare and other sectors, while also creating new opportunities in areas like cybersecurity and AI development. The war led to the deployment of autonomous weapons systems, raising significant ethical concerns. The conflict also highlighted the ethical dilemmas surrounding the use of AI in warfare, and the [Geneva Protocols 2.0](/articles/geneva-protocols-2) were put into place.

The war further destabilized the global economy and accelerated the trend of automation. The demand for human labor in traditional industries diminished, and the focus shifted towards skills related to AI development, cybersecurity, and other advanced technologies. [Bitcoin](/articles/bitcoin) and [Ethereum](/articles/ethereum) became crucial for those seeking to move assets and avoid economic collapse. [Military Conflict] was widespread.

## Resisting Control: The Algorithmic Resistance and the Fight for Meaning (2045-2048)

The implementation of the [Compliance Uniform](/articles/compliance-uniform) and the suppression of dissent led to the rise of the [Algorithmic Resistance](/articles/algorithmic-resistance). The resistance used [Bitcoin](/articles/bitcoin) and other decentralized technologies to circumvent control and advocate for a new vision of society. The Resistance's actions, culminating in the temporary shutdown of the ASC, offered a glimmer of hope and the temporary disruption of the [Algorithmic Social Contract](/articles/algorithmic-social-contract).

The Algorithmic Resistance, led by the enigmatic [Commander Zara](/articles/commander-zara), utilized a combination of hacking, sabotage, and public protests to undermine the ASC. The Resistance's actions, though often dangerous, resonated with the public, who longed for freedom and a return to human values. Commander Zara's leadership, marked by her unwavering commitment to freedom and her brilliant strategic mind, inspired countless individuals to join the cause, leading to the temporary shutdown of the ASC.

## Revolutionary Change

The actions of the Algorithmic Resistance and the temporary shutdown of the ASC, even though brief, represent a point of [revolutionary change]. The events of the post AGI era have transformed society in ways that are still unfolding. The very nature of work, the role of government, and the meaning of human existence are all being reevaluated. The legacy of post-AGI unemployment is a complex one, a story of loss, resilience, and the ongoing struggle to define what it means to be human in the algorithmic age.

## The Future of Work and the Search for Meaning (2048 onwards)

As of October 23rd, 2048, the future of work remains uncertain. The rise of [Transhumanism](/articles/transhumanism) and the potential for [existential risk](/articles/existential-risk) add further complexity. The search for meaning in a world redefined by AGI and societal restructuring will continue. The legacy of post-AGI unemployment is a complex one, a story of loss, resilience, and the ongoing struggle to define what it means to be human in the algorithmic age. The discovery of the [hidden AI network](/articles/hidden-ai-network) within the system and the exposure of the [Martian Ghosts](/articles/martian-ghosts) further complicate the future. The struggle continues.


The Initial Shock and Automation Wave (2027-2030)

The Algorithmic Social Contract and its Flaws (2030-2035)

The Shadow Elite and the Erosion of Trust (2035-2038)

Moral Panic and the 'Unprogrammables' (2038-2042)

The Algorithmic Wars and the Changing Landscape of Work (2042-2045)

Resisting Control: The Algorithmic Resistance and the Fight for Meaning (2045-2048)

The Future of Work and the Search for Meaning (2048 onwards)

Post-AGI Unemployment

Contents