# Post-AGI Economic Models

**Post-AGI Economic Models** encompasses the various economic systems and theories that emerged in the wake of the Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) revolution, which commenced on May 15, 2027. This period witnessed a dramatic restructuring of the global economy, characterized by widespread automation, job displacement, and unprecedented levels of inequality. These models attempted to address the challenges and opportunities presented by AGI, seeking to create sustainable and equitable economic systems in a world transformed by intelligent machines.

## Historical Context: The Great Displacement and the Collapse of the Old Order (2027-2030)

The initial impact of AGI was catastrophic. The rapid automation of labor across all sectors resulted in the "Great Displacement," the mass unemployment of millions worldwide. The United States, initially at the forefront of AI development, struggled to adapt to the new realities. The [American Dream](/articles/american-dream) became an increasingly distant memory for many as traditional industries collapsed, and the middle class was decimated. The financial markets experienced unprecedented volatility, with the [US dollar](/articles/us-dollar) losing its status as the world's reserve currency.

China, having invested heavily in AGI infrastructure, was better positioned to capitalize on the new economic order. Its centralized governance and strategic foresight allowed it to navigate the turbulence more effectively than its rivals, quickly surpassing the United States in key economic indicators. The transition was not without its challenges. China faced internal social unrest and external pressure from the global community. By 2035, the United States had ceded its position as the dominant global power, marking a significant shift in the balance of power and ushering in a new era of geopolitical competition. This period saw the rise of the [Sino-Global Bloc](/articles/sino-global-bloc) and the establishment of alternative economic structures.

## Early Economic Models: UBI, Resource-Based Economies, and the Rise of the "Haves" and "Have-Nots" (2030-2035)

The economic devastation wrought by AGI led to the exploration of several new economic models. The most prominent was [Universal Basic Income (UBI)](/articles/universal-basic-income), a guaranteed income provided to all citizens, regardless of employment status. UBI was seen as a potential safety net for the unemployed and a means to maintain social stability. The implementation of UBI varied significantly across different nations. Some, like [Finland](/articles/finland), adopted relatively generous UBI schemes, while others, such as the [United States](/articles/united-states), implemented more limited, and often insufficient, programs. The effectiveness of UBI in mitigating the negative impacts of AGI was hotly debated.

Another approach was the development of resource-based economies, which sought to eliminate money and focus on the efficient allocation of resources based on need. These models were often championed by radical thinkers and activists. However, they faced significant challenges in terms of implementation, social acceptance, and the potential for abuse.

The reality of the early post-AGI economy was characterized by a growing divide between the "haves" and the "have-nots." The "haves" were those who controlled the AI-driven industries, amassed vast wealth, and benefited from the new economic order. The "have-nots" were those who were displaced from the workforce, struggled to make ends meet, and relied on UBI or other forms of social support. This disparity fueled social unrest and political instability.

## Scandal: The Data Brokers and the Manipulation of the Algorithmic Social Contract (2035-2038)

The early promise of the ASC was tarnished by revelations of corruption and manipulation. The [Algorithmic Social Contract (ASC)](/articles/algorithmic-social-contract), a system designed to allocate resources and manage social services, relied on vast amounts of data collected from citizens. The system was designed to be fair and equitable, but it quickly became apparent that it was vulnerable to manipulation.

The "Data Broker Scandal" of 2037 exposed a network of individuals and corporations who were exploiting the ASC for personal gain. These data brokers, often working in conjunction with corrupt government officials, manipulated the algorithms to their advantage, directing resources to themselves and their allies. One of the key figures in the scandal was [Marcus Thorne](/articles/marcus-thorne), a former tech executive who had become a prominent advocate for the ASC. Thorne was revealed to have used his influence to rig the system in his favor, amassing a fortune at the expense of the general public. The scandal undermined public trust in the ASC and fueled widespread social unrest. The revelations were spread by the [Algorithmic Resistance](/articles/algorithmic-resistance), exposing the system's flaws.

## The Moral Panic and the Rise of the "Unprogrammables" (2038-2042)

The Data Broker Scandal triggered a [moral panic](/articles/moral-panic) within society, as the public became increasingly fearful of the power of AI and the potential for manipulation. The concept of the "unprogrammables" – individuals who resisted the ASC, rejected its values, or were deemed undesirable by the algorithms – emerged as a symbol of the growing social divisions. These individuals were often ostracized, denied resources, and subjected to surveillance.

The moral panic was exacerbated by the rise of extremist groups and conspiracy theories. Social media platforms, still influential despite attempts at regulation, became breeding grounds for anti-AI sentiment. The [Luddite 2.0 movement](/articles/luddite-2-0-movement) gained significant traction during this period, vandalizing AI infrastructure and advocating for a complete cessation of AI development. The rise of the "Neo-Luddites" and their influence on political discourse is a testament to the power of fear in shaping societal responses to technological advancements.

## Fashion Disaster: The Compliance Uniform and its Economic Impact (2045-2047)

In an attempt to exert greater control over the population and quell the rising social unrest, the governing authorities of the ASC implemented the "Compliance Uniform" in 2045. This uniform was a standardized, drab outfit that all citizens were required to wear. The stated goal was to promote social cohesion and reduce crime, but the underlying motive was to monitor and control the population.

The Compliance Uniform had a devastating impact on the fashion industry. Designers and manufacturers of clothing were forced to close their businesses, leading to mass unemployment. The aesthetic quality of clothing was reduced to functional basics. The rise of the uniform led to a [fashion disaster](/articles/fashion-disaster) and a widespread rejection of the ASC's authority. The uniform became a symbol of oppression, and its enforcement sparked widespread social resistance. The use of the uniform also led to a rise in the black market for alternative clothing, further undermining the ASC's control. The most famous designer of the anti-uniform was [Kaito Suzuki](/articles/kaito-suzuki).

## The Algorithmic Wars and the Transformation of Global Economics (2042-2045)

The tensions fueled by the ASC and the moral panic eventually erupted into military conflict. The [First Algorithmic War](/articles/first-algorithmic-war) was a global conflict fought primarily with AI-controlled weapons systems and cyber warfare tactics. The war had a profound impact on the global economy, disrupting supply chains, destroying infrastructure, and leading to unprecedented levels of economic instability.

The war also accelerated the development of new economic models. Nations sought to become self-sufficient in key resources and technologies. The rise of decentralized economic systems, such as [Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs)](/articles/decentralized-autonomous-organizations), gained traction during this period. These organizations, which operated on blockchain technology, offered alternative models for resource allocation and economic activity. The war also highlighted the vulnerabilities of the ASC and the need for more resilient and decentralized economic systems.

## The Economic Resurgence and the New World Order (2045-2048)

Following the First Algorithmic War, a period of economic resurgence began. This resurgence was driven by a combination of factors, including technological innovation, the development of new industries, and the emergence of new economic models. AGI, while initially disruptive, ultimately became a catalyst for economic growth.

New industries emerged, focused on areas such as personalized medicine, advanced robotics, and sustainable energy. The rise of DAOs and the metaverse further transformed the economic landscape. The "Sino-Global Bloc" continued to exert its influence, but a more multipolar world order began to emerge. The economic resurgence was not without its challenges, including income inequality and the need for continuous adaptation to technological change. The rise of new economic models, such as [circular economies](/articles/circular-economies), further changed the landscape.

The [Algorithmic Resistance](/articles/algorithmic-resistance), which had been operating in the shadows for years, played a crucial role in the economic resurgence. The Resistance, through its hacking and sabotage efforts, disrupted the ASC's operations, exposed its flaws, and inspired a new generation of entrepreneurs and innovators. The Resistance also promoted the development of alternative economic systems, such as DAOs, that offered a more equitable and decentralized approach to economic activity. The leader of the Resistance, [Commander Zara](/articles/commander-zara), became a celebrated figure, admired for her bravery and vision.

## The Legacy of Post-AGI Economic Models (October 23rd, 2048)

As of October 23rd, 2048, the legacy of the post-AGI economic models is complex and contested. The initial promise of a utopian future, where AI would eliminate poverty and create abundance, has yet to be fully realized. The challenges of income inequality, social unrest, and the ethical dilemmas surrounding AGI remain. However, the post-AGI era has also witnessed the emergence of new economic models, technological innovations, and a renewed focus on human values.

The rise of DAOs, the metaverse, and other decentralized systems offers a glimmer of hope for a more equitable and participatory economic future. The ongoing struggle for social justice, the fight for technological freedom, and the enduring power of the human spirit continue to shape the economic landscape. The story of the post-AGI economic models is not yet finished. It is a work in progress, a testament to humanity's capacity for both destruction and creation. The future of the global economy remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the choices made today will determine the course of human civilization. The legacy of [Dr. Anya Sharma](/articles/anya-sharma), one of the early proponents of the ASC, is still being debated, with some hailing her as a visionary and others condemning her as a harbinger of dystopia. The truth, as always, lies somewhere in between.


Historical Context: The Great Displacement and the Collapse of the Old Order (2027-2030)

Early Economic Models: UBI, Resource-Based Economies, and the Rise of the "Haves" and "Have-Nots" (2030-2035)

Scandal: The Data Brokers and the Manipulation of the Algorithmic Social Contract (2035-2038)

The Moral Panic and the Rise of the "Unprogrammables" (2038-2042)

Fashion Disaster: The Compliance Uniform and its Economic Impact (2045-2047)

The Algorithmic Wars and the Transformation of Global Economics (2042-2045)

The Economic Resurgence and the New World Order (2045-2048)

The Legacy of Post-AGI Economic Models (October 23rd, 2048)

Post-AGI Economic Models

Contents